Gajendra Thakur
A PARALLEL HISTORY OF MAITHILI LITERATURE- PART 12
Dalit Literary Criticism: Telugu, Gujarati, and Odia Dalit Literature in Maithili Translation
2. The Counter-Mythological Reading: Questioning Krishna's Three Forms
In this single poem Gauri addresses **three mythological forms of Krishna** in sequence -and against all three she raises the **Dalit woman's reality**.
**First Form: Krishna the Destroyer of Maya**
*"You, O brave Krishna! / who killed the demon mother by drinking her milk"* -this is a reference to the Putana episode. In the Purana, Krishna kills Putana, who gives poison to suckle -this is a symbol of **divine heroism**.
Gauri challenges this "heroism": *"I will show you two pieces of flesh and a vessel of blood. / Can you see it without fainting?"* -the work the cobbler woman does daily -dealing with flesh and blood -is more real and more courageous than Krishna's "heroism." This comparison of **mythological heroism and the Dalit daily-labor** is extremely bitter and extremely true.
**Second Form: Krishna the Gopi-Lover**
*"You, who snatched the clothes of the gopis"* -this is a reference to the **cloth-theft episode** which in the devotional tradition is considered **divine play** (*lila*).
Gauri reads this "divine play" from the perspective of **sexual exploitation** -and then challenges: *"Can you steal my heart, / which I have kept safe -/ behind the curtain of skin-leather?"* The heart is kept safe *"behind the curtain of skin-leather"* -this is an extraordinarily complex figure. Skin-leather = the cobbler woman's professional identity = which society considers "impure." That very "impure" identity becomes a **protective shield** -protecting from Krishna's love-conspiracy.
**Third Form: Krishna the Flute-Player**
*"You, who sent love-messages through the flute, / can you read the love-message that I have written on the threshold with my gentle fingers?"* -Krishna's flute is the symbol of **divine love** in devotional poetry. But here the cobbler woman's love-message written on the threshold is more concrete, more real, more human.
"Threshold" -door-step -is a symbol of **boundary**. The Dalit woman writes on the threshold -neither inside (the upper-caste home) nor outside. The love written on the threshold is **marginal love** (the experience of the margin).
The tradition of **counter-mythological reading** from Bhimanna (in which he re-read the personalities of the Mahabharata from the Dalit perspective) is here presented by Gauri in a more dramatic manner -as a **poetic dialogue**.
---
3. The Multi-Level Meaning of the Title
*"Henna-Stained Hands"* -this title is extraordinarily **ambiguous** (double-meaning).
**First meaning** -in Indian cultural tradition henna is a symbol of **wedding celebration** -adornment, auspiciousness, love. "Henna-stained hands" means festive hands.
**Second meaning** -within the poem, "henna" is actually **blood**. *"Can you kiss my blood-stained hands, / without henna?"* -here blood = henna. The blood on the cobbler woman's hands is the **henna of labor** -not of marriage.
This **inverted symbol** (inverting an auspicious symbol into a symbol of labor-reality) is an outstanding example of Dalit aesthetics. In upper-caste culture henna = beauty and celebration. In the cobbler Dalit woman's life henna = blood and labor. Gauri brings both meanings together in a single word.
---
4. The Leather Figure: Reclaiming Dalit Identity
The most powerful section of the poem is the final section -where **leather** (which society considers "impure") becomes the central reclamation-figure of the poem:
*"When my leather is washed with Indian laburnum, / erasing the marks of your fingers -/ it becomes a drum, / resonating with pure music."*
In these lines a **three-level transformation** occurs:
First -**Krishna's finger-marks** (those who snatched the gopis' clothes, who played the flute) are inscribed on the leather -that is, the stamp of **upper-caste cultural claims** is on the Dalit body.
Second -after washing with Indian laburnum (which Subhadra also used in *Laanda*), these marks are erased -that is, **indigenous knowledge-tradition** erases upper-caste cultural claims.
Third -the washed leather **becomes a drum** that resonates with **pure music**. This is of great importance: the leather that society considers "impure," from that same leather the drum produces **"pure music."**
This is the **complete negation of the purity-impurity myth** -not through argument, but through figure. Julia Kristeva's **abjection theory** finds a **poetic answer** here: Gauri transforms the "disgusting" into the "beautiful," the "impure" into "pure music."
---
5. The Play-Figure and Heroism
The poem begins with a **poetic invitation** -*"Won't you come and play with me?"* -which seems like an innocent children's invitation to play. But it immediately becomes clear that this play is about **actually piercing a sturdy bull**.
*"Not the cowardly play of the ox in the procession, / I will show you a game of real heroism"* -here there is a **hierarchical comparison**. Those who parade a castrated bull in a religious procession -that is "cowardly play." The cobbler Dalit woman's work -piercing a sturdy bull -is **real heroism**.
**Jallikattu** (bull-wrestling) in Indian folk tradition is a game of displaying heroism. Gauri, by making this folk tradition a **figure of Dalit-woman labor**, challenges the upper-caste cultural definition of heroism: real heroism is not in the religious procession, but in **daily labor**.
---
6. "Without Bent Spine": Poetic Declaration of Dalit Dignity
*"Come, / if you can come, / I will teach you to pick up bones -/ I will show you a spine that has not bent."*
This line is the **philosophical-political essence** of the entire poem.
"Picking up bones" -the cobbler woman's professional work -here assumes the form of **knowledge transfer**. She wants to teach Krishna. **Teacher** the Dalit woman, **student** Krishna -this is the complete inversion of the hierarchy.
"Spine that has not bent" -here there is a **double meaning**. Literal meaning: an animal's vertebral column that is straight, that has not bent. Figurative meaning: the Dalit woman's self-respect that has not bent.
Babasaheb Ambedkar used to say: *"It is more important that a life be great than that it be long."* Gauri's Dalit woman is not long-lived -she is **indomitable**.
---
7. "Not Sin" -Negating Religious Morality
*"It is not a sin of the water turned to earth, / It is not a sin of the 'criminal' skin."*
"Criminal skin" -here the **quotation marks** are important. The society that calls skin "criminal" -that is the society's **false morality**. Gauri **directly rejects** this morality.
In Brahmanical religious scripture, the cobbler's work is considered **sin** -**the fruit of the karma of a previous birth**. Gauri directly negates this **karma theory**: *"It is not a sin."* These two words -"not sin" -are a poetic manifesto against the entire Brahmanical moral-economic system.
Friedrich Nietzsche's **revaluation of values** (in which he argues that prevailing morality is not truth, but rules created in the interest of those in power) echoes here -but Gauri arrives at this conclusion not by reading Nietzsche, but **from the reality of life**.
---
8. Water Figure: A New Definition of Purity
*"When water becomes steam and turns into a cloud in the sky to rain drops of lightning, / the purity of the lane becomes transparent."*
In these lines **physical science and poetic figure** become one. When water becomes steam -it becomes **invisible**. Then transforming into cloud it rains lightning -it assumes the form of **power**. The Dalit woman's lane that society considers "impure" -its purity becomes **"transparent"** i.e. clear when this transformation occurs. **Transparency = the revelation of truth**.
In this figure there is a poetic representation of **Hegelian dialectics** (in which new truth arises from the conflict of opposing elements) -but here it is not abstract philosophy, it is the **concrete reality of earth and water**.
---
9. Comparison with Bhimanna: Two Forms of Counter-Mythological Reading
Bhimanna's *My Ancestral Rights* and Gauri's *Henna-Stained Hands* -both perform a **counter-reading of mythology**. But the strategy differs:
**Bhimanna** shows the **historical argument** of mythology -Vyasa, Vasishtha, Matsyagandhi were actually of Dalit origin, revealing this historical truth. His strategy is **scholarly counter-reading**.
**Gauri** engages in **dramatic dialogue** with mythology -speaks directly to Krishna, challenges him, invites him to her lane. Her strategy is **poetic confrontation**.
Both together present the **complete spectrum** of counter-mythological reading in Dalit poetry -attacking through argument and attacking through dialogue.
---
10. Consonance with Subhadra's *Laanda*: The Symbol of the Drum
As mentioned above, both Subhadra's *Laanda* and Gauri's *Henna-Stained Hands* contain the **symbol of the drum**. But in different contexts:
In *Laanda* -*"for creaking shoes and making drums -/ he beats a sweet rhythm on that drum"* -the drum is a symbol of the husband's art. The woman's labor transforms into the husband's art -in this there is the bitterness of **labor-alienation**.
In *Henna-Stained Hands* -the drum is a symbol of the Dalit woman's **own identity**. Her body, her labor, her leather -these are all the **source of pure music**. Here there is no labor-alienation -there is **labor-celebration**.
The different use of the drum in both poems demonstrates the **polyphony of a single symbol** in Dalit women's poetry.
---
Conclusion
M. Gauri's *Henna-Stained Hands* is a **pinnacle work** of Telugu Dalit poetry. In this single poem:
**Mythological** and **modern** are one -Krishna and the cobbler woman stand in the same place.
**Craft** and **politics** are one -the beauty of the figure and the social accusation are in the same breath.
**Personal** and **collective** are one -one woman's voice becomes the voice of the entire Dalit cobbler community.
At the end -*"it becomes a drum, / resonating with pure music"* -what Gauri says is: the Dalit woman's body, labor, and identity -which society calls **"impure"** -is in fact the **source of the purest music**. This is not merely a poetic figure -it is a **complete civilizational vision**.
---
Part VII: Madduri Vijayashri's Poem -*Alisamma's Curse*
---
Prefatory Note
Madduri Vijayashri's *Alisamma's Curse* is an **extraordinary poetic achievement** in the Telugu Dalit women's poetic tradition. In this short poem -in merely thirty-odd lines -so much poetic complexity, such historical-mythological density, and such political courage are assembled that it occupies a distinctive position in its own class.
In this poem **three time-periods** are simultaneously present: the Ramayana-era (the cutting of Shurpanakha's nose), contemporary history (the real event of Alisamma), and the present (the contemporary crisis of Dalit women). This **tri-temporal unity** creates an **extraordinary poetic compression of time** in the poem.
---
1. Poetic Form and Structure
**Initial Foreshadowing**
The poem's first three lines -*"You may find this strange, / You may find this laughable, / You may find this very repulsive"* -are an **anaphoric series** that anticipates three different reader-responses.
This structure is highly calculated. The poet knows that her poem will be read by **three types of readers**: those who find it strange (liberals), those who laugh (cynics), those who are disgusted (reactionaries). By addressing all three at once the poet makes clear -*"But now I am a new question"* -**irrespective of any response**, the poem's existence is unshakeable.
**Structure of Self-Introduction**
The middle section of the poem is a **progressive self-introduction** -from negative to positive:
First -what she is **not**: cannot sit in the reserved seat, has no honorific title.
Second -what she **is**: sorrow, rolling, victim of lust.
Third -**naming**: *"I am Alisamma"* -at this line the poem enters a new level.
This structure is the poem's journey from **definition by negation to self-declaration** -which ultimately transforms into a **proclamation of curse**.
**The Final Explosion**
The final section -*"You beasts! / I curse you all"* -is an **abrupt change of register**. The entire poem that had proceeded in a measured, analytical voice -it suddenly transforms into an aggressive roar here. This is a **poetic earthquake**.
---
2. Alisamma: Historical Person and Poetic Symbol
In Shashinirmala's *I am Wearing Menstrual Cloth*, Alisamma's mention had occurred -but there she was merely **a mention by name**. Vijayashri here makes Alisamma the **speaker of the poem** -she herself speaks.
Alisamma is a **real historical person** -a Dalit woman in Andhra Pradesh who was stripped naked and paraded in public by upper-caste men. This event became a **symbolic event of Dalit women's oppression**.
Vijayashri, by making this historical person the **poetic speaker**, accomplishes two tasks simultaneously:
**First** -she transforms Alisamma from **object to subject**. In history she was a victim whose story others told. Here she **speaks herself**.
**Second** -she makes Alisamma **universal**. *"I am Alisamma"* -in this the "I" is not merely one individual, but **all Dalit women**.
Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak's question **"Can the Subaltern Speak?"** (can the subordinate class be present in history in its own voice?) is answered here by Vijayashri: **Yes -in this poem.** Alisamma is speaking.
---
3. The Mythological-Historical Parallel: Shurpanakha and Alisamma
The most courageous poetic decision in the poem is -linking **the cutting of Shurpanakha's nose** and **Alisamma's public stripping** in the same line:
*"First my ears and nose were cut at Lord Ram's command. / Now just recently, / I became suffering in police hands without reason."*
In this **parallelism** there are many layers of meaning:
**First level** -in both events the oppressor is a man and the victim is a Dalit/excluded woman. Shurpanakha is of demon lineage -the social "other." Alisamma is of Dalit lineage -the social "other."
**Second level** -in both events **state power** is a participant in oppression. At Ram's command, Lakshmana cuts the nose. By police hands, Alisamma suffers. The **religious-state** (Ramayana-era) and the **modern state** -both do the same thing.
**Third level** -in the Ramayana, Shurpanakha's **desire was treated as crime** -she had wanted to marry Ram or Lakshmana. Alisamma's **existence was treated as crime**. In both events, **woman's desire or woman's presence** becomes the cause of oppression.
**Fourth level** -*"Lord Ram"* -here "Lord" is **ironic**. He who is "Lord" (God, protector) commands the oppression of women. This is the **negation of religion-based morality**.
The tradition of Bhimanna's **counter-mythological reading** (in which he re-read the Mahabharata's personalities) goes further in this poem. Bhimanna re-read history -Vijayashri shows by connecting history to the present that **nothing has changed**.
---
4. The Philosophy of "New Question"
*"But now I am a new question"* -this line is of utmost importance.
In traditional philosophy a **question** is a means, an **answer** is the goal. In the Socratic method questions lead towards truth. But Vijayashri says: **I myself am the question.**
This is an **existentialist declaration**. The Dalit woman is not an answer -she is **herself a question** -for society, for the system, for history. As long as the Dalit woman is alive, **the question will not end**.
Simone de Beauvoir's "otherness" in *The Second Sex* (in which she argues that woman has always been the "other" -defined in relation to man) becomes more complex here with the Dalit-caste dimension. The Dalit woman is not "other" -she is **a question** -that demands an answer.
---
5. The Poetic-Political Importance of "Curse"
The title and final declaration -**"curse"** -is extraordinarily multi-layered.
**Curse in Religious Tradition**
In the Hindu religious tradition, the **curse of sages and ascetics** is considered extremely powerful. Brahma's curse, Durvasa's curse -these are irrevocable. The **right to curse** has always belonged to upper-caste men.
Vijayashri gives this **right to curse** into the hands of the Dalit woman. This is an **inversion of the hierarchy**: she who always received curses -now gives them.
**The Content of the Curse**
*"I curse you all that you will be turned into humans -/ breaking and reforming your tails and pointed teeth."*
This curse is **extraordinarily unusual**. Ordinarily a curse is **destructive** -die, be reduced to ashes, become an animal. Vijayashri's curse is **transformative** -**become human**.
In this there is a profound philosophical sarcasm: those who are the oppressors -police, upper-castes, those who behave like animals -are **actually animals**. To curse them to **become human** -this is the **supreme irony**.
In this there is an echo of Frantz Fanon's **anti-colonial philosophy** -where he argues that the colonist/oppressor has actually **lost their humanity**. The victim is **more humane**, the oppressor **less**. Vijayashri transforms this argument into a **poetic curse**.
---
6. The Absence of Honorific Title
*"When spoken to or called out to, / there is no honorific title before or after my name."*
This line exposes the relationship between **language and social identity**. In Indian society names are preceded or followed -"Shrimati," "Doctor," "Late," caste-indicating surname -these are all **marks of social recognition**.
When the Dalit woman speaks or calls out -she is **nameless**. Neither "Shrimati" (married honor), nor caste-surname (which gives social place), nor professional title.
The linguist Pierre Bourdieu's concept of **linguistic capital** (in which he shows that social power-relations are reflected in language) applies here. The **right to naming** is a **social power**. Before and after the Dalit woman's name is **zero** -this emptiness is the symbol of her **absence** in society.
---
7. The Figure of the Reserved Seat
*"Even though it is empty, / I cannot sit in the seat reserved for women."*
This line is an extraordinarily precise poetic presentation of **contemporary Dalit women's experience**. Bus, train, office -the "Women Reserved" seat is theoretically for all women. But in practice the Dalit woman cannot sit on it -because upper-caste women or men **object**.
In this figure the distinction between **law and reality** is revealed. The Indian Constitution guarantees equality -but in **social reality** this guarantee is like an empty seat -present, but inaccessible.
Swarooparani's **stigmatization through reservations** (humiliation by calling "she came from quota") and Vijayashri's **inaccessibility of reserved seat** -both together demonstrate the contradiction between the **Dalit woman's constitutional rights and social reality**.
---
8. "Lighting a Wick in Court's Eye"
*"I am Alisamma, / who lit a wick in the eye of the court."*
This figure carries **extraordinary poetic density**.
**"Court's eye"** -in the symbol of justice the **blindfolded goddess** (Justitia, eye-bandaged) exists in the Western tradition -saying justice is impartial. But in the Indian context the court has been **partial to caste-class**.
**"Lighting a wick in the eye"** -ordinarily lighting a lamp's wick is **spreading light**. But lighting a wick in the eye is **torment**. Alisamma going to court -which should be for obtaining justice -becomes a **torture experience**.
In this figure there is both **hope and irony**: Alisamma went to court to **bring light** -but in that "eye" the wick **burned**, kept burning.
---
9. "Still Alive as Woman and Dalit Both"
This line is the **essence-sentence of Dalit women's poetry**.
"Both" -this single word encompasses the entire history of oppression. Oppression as a woman. Oppression as a Dalit. Both together. **"Both"** says: despite all this.
This is the **political act of living**. Paul Gilroy considers **"living, laughing, loving"** a form of **cultural resistance** against oppression. Vijayashri's "still alive" -in this sense -living itself is rebellion.
---
10. All Five Poets: A Final Synthesis
In this entire review series we have studied five Telugu Dalit poets -Bhimanna, Subhadra, Swarooparani, Shashinirmala, Gauri, and Vijayashri. All together create a **complete Dalit-women's poetic universe**:
**Bhimanna** -Mirror of History. Counter-reading of mythology and history.
**Subhadra** -Mirror of Labor. Poetic archiving of the concrete world of objects in daily life.
**Swarooparani** -Mirror of Consciousness. The journey of personal transformation.
**Shashinirmala** -Mirror of Struggle. Three-fronted struggle from three-fronted oppression.
**Gauri** -Mirror of Identity. Transformation of "impure" identity into pure music.
**Vijayashri** -Mirror of Justice. Making the victim of history the speaker, making the curse into a weapon.
These six mirrors together create the **complete reflection of the Dalit woman's existence**.
---
Conclusion
Madduri Vijayashri's *Alisamma's Curse* is the **supreme poetic moment** of this entire Telugu Dalit poetry series.
In this poem:
**History speaks** -Alisamma, who was an object, becomes the speaker.
**Mythology is shattered** -Ram's "lordship" and the police's "authority" are joined in the same line.
**Language rebels** -"curse" -which was the privilege of the upper-caste -becomes the Dalit woman's weapon.
**Philosophy is born** -living is rebellion, becoming a question is power.
The final line -*"breaking and reforming your tails and pointed teeth"* -is a **demand of the future**. As long as the oppressor does not abandon **their animality**, the curse will remain active. This demand is addressed to society, to the system, to history -to everyone.
And this question -*"Now I am a new question"* -is the **final, unanswered, and most powerful** voice of this entire Telugu Dalit poetry series.
---
Part VIII: Gujarati Dalit Poetry -Four Poems
Anish Garange, Rajendra Vadel 'Jeeta', Umesh Solanki
---
Prefatory Note
The Gujarati Dalit poetry presented in this collection -following the Telugu tradition -is poetic expression of Dalit experience on a **different linguistic-cultural terrain**. While the **Dalit-woman voice** was prominent in the Telugu poems, here the **Dalit-male voice** is more central -but in Vadel's *Sambhog* the Dalit-woman reality reappears.
The three poets -Garange, Vadel, Solanki -adopt three different poetic strategies: Garange uses **urban realism** (the concrete, sensory reality of city life), Vadel uses **sexual-political testimony**, and Solanki uses **freeze-figures** and **anti-Gandhi irony**. These three together create a **complete urban-political picture** of Gujarati Dalit poetry.
---
1. Anish Garange: *Poster*
**Poetic Form and Structure**
*Poster* is composed in a **circular structure** (in which the first line becomes the last). *"These rough-faced posters are like a mirror to me"* -the poem begins with this and ends with this. This **circular structure** symbolically expresses the **endless cycle** of Dalit existence -from which there is no exit.
The lines in the middle -cinema banners, advertisements, condolence meetings, toilets, rallies, railway stations, rickshaws, missing-person posters -these are all **fragments of urban life**. Structurally this is **collage-poetry** (the poetic technique of creating meaning by assembling seemingly unrelated pieces).
**The Multi-Layered Nature of the Poster-Figure**
"Poster" in this poem is extraordinarily **multi-meaning**:
**First meaning** -a poster is **temporary**. It is pasted one day, peeled off by morning. Dalit existence is also, in society's eyes, **temporary, replaceable**.
**Second meaning** -a poster is **public** -everyone sees it, no one pays attention. The Dalit person is also **visible but invisible**.
**Third meaning** -a poster is **polymorphous** -cinema, advertisement, political rally, missing person -all kinds of posters exist. The Dalit person is also used by various social institutions for **various purposes**.
"Mirror" (*aina*) -the most important figure of the poem. The poster that is the Dalit's "mirror" -this is **irony**. A mirror gives an authentic reflection. But a poster is a **distorted, humiliated, purpose-constructed** image. That is: the "mirror" that society shows the Dalit -is a **false mirror**.
Jacques Lacan's **mirror stage** (in which he argues that the child, seeing its reflection in the mirror, constructs its "I") applies here **negatively**. The "mirror" (poster) that the Dalit person sees presents a **distorted self-image** -imposed by society.
**Urban Realism**
*"In 'pay-and-use' toilets you urinate on me"* -this line is **extremely direct**. The "pay-and-use toilet" -a concrete urban space -is here a figure of **social humiliation**. There is a right to enter the toilet for money -but urinating on the Dalit is free.
*"I am a ball of useless paper"* -this is **self-objectification** (treating oneself as an object) -but this self-objectification comes not from self-hatred, but from **acceptance of social reality**. The poem says: this is how society sees me.
*"Khaman-Khari"* -this Gujarati food item is here a cultural-geographic identity. "A face smeared with Khaman-Khari" -the **middle-class-upper-caste image** of Gujarati culture (Khaman-dhokla that has become the symbolic food of Gujarat) is smeared on the Dalit face -**humiliatingly, sardonically**.
Walter Benjamin's **urban experience** (in which he argues that the modern city dissolves the human into a mass of objects) becomes more complex in the Dalit-urban experience: the city not only **anonymizes** but also **constructs caste-stigma**.
---
2. Rajendra Vadel 'Jeeta': *Sambhog* (Intercourse)
**Poetic Form: Sexual-Political Testimony**
*Sambhog* is the Gujarati counterpart of the **sexual-political voice** of Shashinirmala in the Telugu Dalit poetry series -but with an important difference: here the **speaker is male**, and the poem analyzes the **physical relationship** between the upper-caste man and the Dalit woman.
This is an extraordinarily **courageous poetic decision**. Sexual relations are generally considered a private subject. Vadel makes this the subject of **political analysis**.
**The "Foul-Smelling" Body**
*"Your body was fouled from your ancestors who crushed Dalit women"* -this line is extraordinarily complex.
**"Fouled"** -the Dalit caste is generally called "impure" and "foul-smelling." Vadel **inverts this pollution-stigma**: the upper-caste body is fouled by the **history of rape of Dalit women**.
**"From ancestors"** -this word is important. This is not a personal sin -it is **historical exploitation passed down from generation to generation**. In the upper-caste man's body, the deeds of those ancestors are **materially present**.
In Vadel's these lines there is a poetic representation of **epigenetics** (in which science shows that the ancestor's experience leaves an effect on the descendant's biology). And with this, Fanon's concept of the **colonized body** (in which he shows that the history of violence is inscribed in the colonizer's body).
**The Final Declaration: "Bharat" and "Bharati"**
*"If from our intercourse a son is born / name him 'Bharat' / if a daughter, 'Bharati'."*
This is the **most explosive line** in the poem. Several levels of meaning are simultaneously present:
**First level** -"Bharat" and "Bharati" are names of national identity -**national symbols**. Calling the child of the Dalit woman and upper-caste man "Bharat" -this reveals the true history of **nation-building**. The Indian nation is the product of this **caste-sexual violence**.
**Second level** -in the nationalist imagination of "Bharat Mata," the mother is **upper-caste, pure**. Vadel shows that the **real "Bharat Mata"** is the Dalit woman -upon whose body the nation's history was written.
**Third level** -*"if a son"* / *"if a daughter"* -this hypothetical sentence-construction is a **demand of the future**: accept this truth.
B.R. Ambedkar argued in *Annihilation of Caste* that the permanence of caste depends on **endogamy** (where the upper caste marries within its own caste). Vadel's poem **inverts** this argument: the abolition of caste begins not merely with marriage, but with **acknowledging the history of caste-violence**.
---
3. Umesh Solanki: *People, Freeze!*
**Poetic Form: Extension of the Freeze-Figure**
*People, Freeze!* is based on a **single extended metaphor**. "Freeze" -this simple physical action -becomes a **complex political figure** in the poem.
The structure is **anaphoric** (repeatedly beginning with the same phrase) -the repetition of *"freeze"* gives the poem a **mantra-quality**. But this mantra is not devotion -it is **revolutionary**.
**The Political Philosophy of "Freezing"**
The "freeze" that Solanki wants -is not against stability, but a demand for change **through** stability.
*"Let the tea in the kettle freeze"* -tea is a symbol of **movement, heat** -made and drunk every day. Its freezing = the stopping of daily normalcy.
*"Let the soft fingers go cold and freeze like dead sea-shells at the mere touch of a coin"* -"coin" (money) and "soft fingers" -a **figure of capitalist labor-exploitation**. The fingers that touch money turn to dead stone -**capital turns humans to stone**.
*"To clear this thick blanket of fog"* -"fog" -a figure of **ignorance, delusion, lies**. The social delusion by which Dalit oppression seems normal -that "fog" will only clear through **freezing** -that is, through a radical stop.
Marx's **accumulated labor** (in which he argues that capital is actually the worker's accumulated labor that passes into the owner's hands) is in poetic dialogue with Solanki's "freezing": if labor "freezes" -that is, **strikes** -the system collapses that rests on this labor.
---
4. Umesh Solanki: *All the Broom-Sticks*
**Poetic Form: Sarcastic Address**
*All the Broom-Sticks* is a **direct address poem** -speaking directly to Gandhiji. In this poetic technique there is resemblance to Gauri's *Henna-Stained Hands* (address to Krishna) and Vijayashri's *Alisamma's Curse* (address to the oppressor).
But this poem's address is **singular**: Gandhi -who claimed to be the Dalit's **"Mahatma"** (well-wisher) -to him **anger** and **disappointment** expressed directly.
**The Poetic Representation of the Gandhi-Ambedkar Conflict**
The Gandhi-Ambedkar controversy was India's most important **political-philosophical controversy**. Gandhi wanted, calling Dalits "Harijans," to lift them within the Hindu system through reform. Ambedkar **completely rejected** this system at its roots.
Solanki brings this **historical controversy** into poetry:
*"Your khadi wears out very quickly"* -khadi is Gandhi's **symbol** -Swadeshi, simplicity, nationality. "Wearing out" = the **hollowness of the symbol** being revealed. Gandhi's ideals proved **not durable** in Dalit life.
*"You must surely be hating the life locked in a frame on the wall"* -in government offices, schools, homes -Gandhi's picture is **locked in a frame**. This "frame" is a symbol of **institutionalization** -turning Gandhi into a **museum-object**, so that his **real ideas** have no effect on society.
*"Who are you smiling for?"* -this question is **extremely sharp**. There is a **smile** in Gandhi's picture. But in the lives of the Dalit community he claimed to work for -there is **no reason to smile**. For whom is that smile?
**"The Broom-Sticks"**
The title -*"All the Broom-Sticks"* -is extraordinarily **multi-meaning**. The "broom" was the symbol of Gandhi's **cleanliness movement** -Swadeshi, simplicity, nationality. But **"broom-sticks"** (the broom's handle) -what remains when the broom wears out.
The poem shows these **remnants** -the people left behind by the cleanliness movement: *"in the city's secret lanes the sweepings of broom-handles -/ they grumble / they groan."*
This "grumbling" and "groaning" -the Dalit sanitation workers who were left outside Gandhi's "cleanliness" movement -these are **their words of torment**.
**July 2009: Historical Context**
At the poem's end there is a contextual note: **the liquor tragedy in Ahmedabad in July 2009**. In this event, mainly **Dalit workers** died after drinking spurious liquor.
Gandhi was **anti-liquor**. Gujarat is a **prohibition state** -the land of Gandhi's ideals. But in that "Gandhian" state, Dalit workers die from spurious liquor.
*"Gandhi / I pour liquor on your head"* -this line is extremely aggressive. Liquor on Gandhi's head -which was his **greatest prohibition** -pouring it: this is **complete rejection**.
*"Shame / may the bag of liquor go over your skull"* -this is a **curse** -like Vijayashri's *Alisamma's Curse*. But here the curse is more **ironic**: liquor -which was against Gandhi -on Gandhi.
B.R. Ambedkar's Gandhi-criticism -that Gandhi was doing politics in the name of Dalits but was not **fundamentally** changing the caste system -takes **poetic form** in Solanki's poem.
---
5. Comparative Analysis: Telugu versus Gujarati
Comparing these Gujarati poems with the Telugu tradition, several important differences and similarities emerge:
**Urban-centricity**: Telugu Dalit poetry is generally connected to **rural-agricultural** reality -field, paddy, landlord. Gujarati poetry is **urban-centric** -railway station, rickshaw, toilet, advertisement. This demonstrates the **geographic diversity** of Dalit experience.
**Male voice**: In the Telugu Dalit poetry series, **the women's voice** was dominant. In the Gujarati collection all three poets are **male**. This reveals the different forms of **regional Dalit movements**.
**Gandhi episode**: Gandhi's mention is generally absent in Telugu Dalit poetry. In Gujarati Dalit poetry -written in Gandhi's home state -the **Gandhi-Ambedkar controversy** is central. This is the entry of **local history** into poetry.
**Poetic language**: **Indigenous symbols** (Indian laburnum, tamarind, Maisamma Devi) abound in Telugu poetry. **Urban-modern symbols** (poster, advertisement, pay-and-use toilet) predominate in Gujarati poetry.
---
6. Special Note on the Translation Series
These poems made the journey of Gujarat → English (Hemang Desai) → Maithili. An important difference from the Telugu poems' translation: the Telugu → English translation was done by Purushottam K., the Gujarati → English by **Hemang Desai**.
Hemang Desai is himself a scholar of Gujarati Dalit literature -this was the work of an **insider translator** (who is also a member of the culture from which the translation is made). From this **culturally-specific references** (like "Khaman-Khari," "Kharda") were translated with greater authenticity.
---
Conclusion
These four Gujarati Dalit poems together present a complete picture of **urban Dalit experience**:
Garange's **Poster** -poetry of the Dalit existence's invisibility and distorted visibility.
Vadel's **Sambhog** -poetry connecting the history of caste-sexual violence to nation-building.
Solanki's **People, Freeze!** -poetry of radical stopping, of strike, of systemic halt.
Solanki's **All the Broom-Sticks** -poetry of the contradiction between Gandhism and Dalit reality.
All four together create a **poetic manifesto**: the **modern Indian state** -its symbols (Gandhi, national flag, Constitution) and its institutions (police, court, media) -has **failed** to deliver justice to Dalit existence.
And as long as this failure continues, Dalit poetry -in Telugu, in Gujarati, in Maithili -will continue **questioning, bearing witness, and cursing**.
---
Part IX: Odia Dalit Poetry -Basudev Sunani's Three Poems
*Still Much Remains to Be Done*, *Address*, and *Sadananda*
---
Prefatory Note
Basudev Sunani is a **distinctive and complex** voice in Odia Dalit poetry. Different from Telugu and Gujarati Dalit poetry -in which **direct political proclamation** or **personal pain's testimony** was at the center -Sunani's poetry expresses the Dalit experience through **mystical and philosophical** dimensions. His poetic language is **full of figurative density** -in which a drop, a seed, a fish, an egret, the sea -these natural-cosmic images become the poetic expression of the Dalit identity's **invisibility and struggle**.
This collection contains three related poetic sections -*Still Much Remains to Be Done*, *Address*, and *Sadananda* -which together present a **three-dimensional poetic argument**: the **warning** of existence, the **invisibility** of existence, and the **innocence and irony** of existence.
---
1. Poetic Form and Structure
**Still Much Remains to Be Done**
In this poem two **refrain lines** appear repeatedly -*"Still I feel I don't know why / that just at the corner / something is hanging and swaying"* -at the poem's beginning and middle. This **repetition** creates a sense of **permanent uncertainty** -as if something were incomplete, as if some explosion were yet to occur.
The structure is based on **paradoxical pairs**: "the bell's sound" versus "the drum's explosion," "the collection of sticks and leaves" versus "the house's demolition," "Paanchajanya" versus "the smallest reaction." These pairs show the **bipolar tension** of Dalit identity -invisibility and explosion.
**Address**
In this poem the structure is that of **fragmented self-portrayal**. "I am still..." -this line comes three times, in three different forms:
First -**an old woman** (who carries a lamp in a wedding procession). Second -**a sick old man** (who begs in front of a temple). Third -**a sleeping child** (lying on a step in the cold).
These three are the **three generations of Dalit existence** -elderly, adult, infant -all living in the same invisibility.
"And yet you want my address! / Strange!" -this **sardonic astonishment** (the poet is himself amazed that an address is demanded when his existence is everywhere) is the **emotional center** of the entire poem.
**Sadananda**
This poem's structure is a **dramatic monologue** -a real person, Sadananda, who came to a farmers' fair in the capital city, sees the sea. This **simple-realistic** structure is different from both previous poems.
But within this simplicity a **deep political question** is hidden: *"Why should famine not strike my region? / When all the water is mortgaged to the sea."*
---
2. "Paanchajanya" and "Vajra": Dalit Use of Mythological Figures
*"I know that here no voice / is less than 'Paanchajanya.' / The smallest reaction / roars like a thunderbolt."*
"Paanchajanya" -Krishna's **conch** -which signaled the beginning of the Mahabharata war. In this figure **the Dalit voice** is compared to Krishna's conch.
Bhimanna's **counter-mythological reading** tradition is here used by Sunani in a different way: he does not **oppose** the mythological symbol, he **borrows** it -and says that the Dalit voice is **no less** than that sacred sound.
This is a strategy of **reclamation**. Bhimanna used to say: the mythology's history was written incorrectly. Sunani says: our voice is **equal** to that mythology's supreme symbol.
---
3. Drop, Seed, and Pregnant Woman: Three Figures of Hope
In the final section of *Still Much Remains to Be Done* three hope-images come simultaneously:
*"Here in the sky there is such a drop / which though indistinct shines / and dreaming a sweet dream of a rainbow / has vowed again and again / to color the vast sky."*
*"Here a seed has vowed to germinate / with the wish to make everything green."*
*"And here in sadness / an abandoned pregnant woman / is searching for a quiet moment -/ to give birth to a child / who can face and stop seven warriors."*
These three images are a series of **progressively increasing power**: drop → seed → mother of warriors.
**Drop** -most tiny, indistinct. But it dreams of a rainbow -**aspiration for vastness within smallness**.
**Seed** -larger than drop. It **vows** to germinate -not a passive wish, but an **active resolve**.
**Pregnant woman** -most powerful. She is "abandoned" -left by society. But she awaits **birth of a child who can face seven warriors**.
The echo of the Dalit women poets of the Telugu tradition resonates in this image of the **abandoned pregnant woman** -Subhadra's **"Avva"**, Swarooparani's **"Hands Turned to Earth"**. But Sunani makes this woman **the mother of a future revolution**.
---
4. *Address* Poem: The Paradox of Invisibility and Omnipresence
The central paradox of the *Address* poem is: the Dalit existence is **present everywhere** -but **invisible**.
*"From beginning to end / my presence / spreads like a shimmering line of ants / and resonates like the sound of cymbals."*
"A line of ants" -minute, infinite, industrious -but **no one pays attention**. "The sound of cymbals" -sound is present, **no one listens**.
*"For my address / you don't need to send a parcel now / with the address 'Care of the Sun or Moon'."*
This line is extraordinarily **sarcastic**. Society wants to find the Dalit -but in the **wrong place**. Sun-moon -that is, **abstract, philosophical, spiritual places** -it searches. While the Dalit is in **"that very dark lane"** -in **concrete, material, daily** places.
In this, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak's **"invisibility of the subaltern"** (in which she argues that the intellectual-class wants to find the Dalit but in that place where they are not) takes poetic form.
*"If you can / please send me -/ beautiful dreams filled with sunshine."*
This is a **reversed demand**. The Dalit does not give an address -he **demands dreams**. This is irony: society that demands the Dalit's address -itself **gives no dreams** to the Dalit.
---
5. The Fish Figure: On the Edge of Extinction
*"I swim like a small dream-laden fish / in the fistful of water of a disappearing pond."*
This figure connects **environmental and social destruction** in a single image. The pond is disappearing -this is the reference to India's **agricultural water-crisis**. The fish -which is the **traditional livelihood** of Dalit castes -lives in **"a fistful of water."**
"Dream-laden fish" -this image is both extraordinarily beautiful and sad. The fish has dreams -but the pond is drying up.
In Umesh Solanki's *People, Freeze!* the **"freeze"** was a demand for change. Sunani's **"disappearing pond"** -shows the result of change's **absence**.
*"Should I plunge into the sea to give it nectar / or dig deep and push Vasuki serpent's gentle head / that holds the world in balance?"*
This is a **mythological dilemma**. Vasuki serpent -who became rope in the churning of the ocean -holds the world in balance. The Dalit person asks: should I **give nectar to the system** (that is, contribute) or **shake the system** (push Vasuki)?
This is the philosophical question of **revolution versus cooperation** -which is the fundamental question of the entire Dalit political-philosophical tradition.
---
6. *Sadananda*: Short Story-Poem and Farmer's Vision
*Sadananda* is an entirely different voice in this series. While in the previous two poems a **poetic "I"** -an abstract, collective Dalit-consciousness -was the speaker, here a **concrete individual** -with name, village, reason -is present.
*"My name is Sadananda. / My village's name is Nagaon. / I have come to Bhubaneswar for the farmers' fair / to receive the Governor's prize for the biggest okra."*
This **self-introduction** is extremely simple and extremely profound. In literature, the Dalit character is generally **nameless, collective**. Giving Sadananda a **name, village, and achievement** -this is the **politics of personhood**.
"The biggest okra" -this detail **seems amusing**. But in it is a deep **irony**: the farmer who works in the field all year, their highest honor is "the biggest okra." This is both the **devaluation of agricultural labor** and the portrayal of the **farmer's simplicity**.
**The Irony of the Sea-View**
*"Having seen the sea you said / that I did not understand / rather I understood wrongly -/ the waves."*
Sadananda sees the sea for the first time. The **urban intellectual** (the "you") says -you didn't understand. Sadananda acknowledges: *"Perhaps / I understood wrongly."*
But at the poem's end this **"misunderstanding"** becomes a **revelation of truth**:
*"Why should famine not strike my region? / When all the water is mortgaged to the sea."*
Sadananda "misunderstood" the sea -but in his "misunderstanding" there is **a political truth** that the intellectual cannot see. The sea -which is grand, vast, and admired -is in reality **the one holding the farmer's water as mortgage**.
This **epistemological inversion** (in which the "uneducated" farmer's vision proves sharper than the "educated" intellectual's) is of utmost importance. Ganesh Devy's **"After Amnesia"** (in which he argues that oral-folk tradition's knowledge is many times superior to book-knowledge) finds **poetic evidence** here.
---
7. "Being Cut by the Egret": Playfulness and Disruption
*"But engrossed in playfulness / at the most inauspicious moment / I am cut by the egret."*
"Egret" -a **predatory bird** -that eats fish. In the context of the fish-figure (in which Dalit existence was fish) -"being cut by the egret" = **being destroyed by the system**.
"Engrossed in playfulness" -this is **irony**: exactly when the Dalit person feels **free, joyful** -then the **blow** comes.
In this image the **uncertainty of Dalit life's** poetic truth: joy is always **temporary**, crisis always comes **suddenly**.
---
8. Comparative Analysis: Odia versus Telugu-Gujarati
**Mysticism versus Realism**: Telugu Dalit poetry (especially Subhadra, Shashinirmala) is **bitterly realistic** -concrete, sensory. Sunani's poetry is full of **mystical-natural** images -drop, seed, fish, rainbow. This is the influence of the **Odia poetic tradition** which has a long tradition of nature-images.
**Optimism versus Pessimism**: In Gujarati poetry (especially Solanki's *People, Freeze!*) there is **revolutionary exhortation**. In Sunani's poetry **hope and doubt** are both simultaneously -the drop sees a rainbow but the pond dries up.
**Individuality versus Collectivity**: In *Sadananda* a **concrete individual** is present -who is mostly an anonymous "I" in Telugu-Gujarati poetry. This is the **commitment to personhood** in Odia poetry.
**Intellectual-Farmer Controversy**: The dialogue of **"you"** (urban intellectual) and **"I"** (farmer) in *Sadananda* -this is absent in Telugu-Gujarati poetry. Sunani brings this **intra-Dalit class-controversy** into poetry.
---
Conclusion
Basudev Sunani's three poetic sections -*Still Much Remains to Be Done*, *Address*, *Sadananda* -present a **distinctive philosophical-poetic tradition** of Odia Dalit poetry.
In the first section -**warning**: something remains to be done, an explosion is coming.
In the second section -**evidence**: I am everywhere but invisible, my address is in "the dark lane."
In the third section -**irony**: Sadananda "misunderstood" -but in his misunderstanding there is truth that the intellectual cannot see.
All three together present a **complete Dalit philosophy of existence**: I exist (evidence), I will bring change (warning), I see truth through my own vision (negation through irony).
The final line -*"Because I still remain in that dark lane / where I always was. / Always."* -is the **most quiet and most powerful** final word of this entire collection, and perhaps of all Indian Dalit poetry.
"Always" -in this single word lies **the entire weight of history, present, and invisibility**.
---
Part X: Dalit Short Fiction -Two Telugu Works
*The Crow* by Kolakuri Enoch and *Black Ink* by Vinodini
---
Prefatory Note
In this review series we have studied **poetry** so far. Now two **short stories** -*The Crow* and *Black Ink* -are presented. These two works represent the **prose tradition** of Dalit literature, and demonstrate the distinctive power of a **narrative medium** different from poetry.
Between the two stories there is a **poetic paradox**: *The Crow* is the story of **external reality** -community, ritual, power-relations; *Black Ink* is the story of **internal reality** -personal relationship, child-psychology, and the caste's moment-to-moment revelation. Together they reveal both the **external and internal** dimensions of Dalit experience.
---
1. *The Crow*: Narrative Structure and Craft
**Narrative Perspective**
The story is written from the **third-person omniscient** perspective -but this omniscience is **selective**. The narrator knows Avva's mental state, Bandodu's history, the crows' behavior -but **never passes judgment**. This **detached narration** creates a distinctive narrative effect: the reader judges for themselves.
**Timeline and Information**
The story's structure is **in medias res** (beginning from the middle of events) -the crows are already cawing, Bandodu is already at work. **Background information** -Bandodu's caste, their practice, the family's plight -is gradually, naturally revealed within the story.
This **delayed exposition** technique first draws the reader onto the story's surface -the crow's commotion, Bandodu's presence -and then slowly **social complexity** is revealed.
**The Three-Level Structure**
**First level** -**Event**: the crows caw, the hut is surrounded, Bandodu demands food.
**Second level** -**Social explanation**: Bandodu's caste, their practice, the crow-Bandodu relationship, the Madiga community's response.
**Third level** -**Philosophical question**: are liberation and curse the same thing? Are the crow and Bandodu enemies or family?
---
2. *The Crow*: Bandodu -A Unique Literary Character
Bandodu is a **unique character** in Telugu Dalit literature -and perhaps in all Indian literature. He is the **lowest among the Dalits** -the tenth sub-caste, living only by begging from the Madigas.
**The Character's Paradox**
Bandodu is **powerless** -a beggar, the lowest of caste. But he is also **powerful** -"more powerful than a stubborn king," controlling the crows, holding an entire community hostage.
This **paradoxical power** comes from where? The story says: his **unique expertise** -killing crows -gives him an **unique authority** in that society where crows are not harmed.
In this character, **Michel Foucault's power theory** (in which he argues that power does not always come from above, it is rooted in **local points of expertise**) comes to life. Bandodu's power comes not from his caste -but from his **unique knowledge**.
**Bandodu and the Politics of the "Abject"**
*"A disgusting beggar like Bandodu cannot be seen anywhere in the world."* -the narrator presents here **society's gaze**. But that very society is also **afraid** of Bandodu.
Julia Kristeva's **abjection theory** is extremely pertinent here: Bandodu is society's **"abject"** (disgusting-excluded) -but for that very reason he is also **indispensable**. The things considered "disgusting" -crow-meat, vomit, stench -over all of these Bandodu has **monopoly**, which gives him a strange power.
---
3. *The Crow*: The Multi-Layered Nature of the Crow Figure
The crow in this story is not merely a bird -it is a **multi-layered figure**.
**Crow versus Society**
In Indian folk tradition, the crow is the **spirit of ancestors**, **omen of ill fortune**, **symbol of collective memory**. In this story the crows establish a **collective justice system** -which is more **direct and immediate** than the human justice system.
When Bandodu does not get food -the crow takes revenge. This is **spontaneous justice** -no court, no law.
**The Crow-Bandodu Relationship**
The story's most philosophical question: *"Are the crow and Bandodu enemies? Or are they each other's family (own)?"*
There is no simple answer to this question. Bandodu **kills** crows -but the crows **caw in support** of Bandodu. Both are on the same **social margin** -both considered useless by society, both living in the same invisibility. In this **marginal solidarity** the story's central argument lies.
---
4. *The Crow*: "Liberation is Only a Curse" -The Central Paradox
The story's **philosophical climax** is:
*"Bandodu will never come again to beg in that house. This is liberation (salvation). Liberation is only a curse. Since then, it will be a house where crows do not sit. A house where Bandodu does not beg. This is an insult. An excommunication!"*
In this paradox the most profound insight of the **Dalit social reality** lies:
Bandodu's not coming = **liberation** (liberation from the burden of his begging).
Bandodu's not coming = **curse** (the social-ritualistic death of that house).
Crows' not sitting = **liberation** (liberation from attack).
Crows' not sitting = **curse** (that house humiliated, excommunicated).
This **liberation=curse** equation reveals a **brutal truth** of the Dalit social system: in this system **liberation and bondage are the same thing**. He who goes out is **excommunicated**. He who stays within is **exploited**. No third option exists.
In Vijayashri's *Alisamma's Curse*, the curse was "transforming into humanity." In Enoch's story "liberation itself was a curse." Together they express the **paradoxical reality** of the Dalit experience most completely.
---
5. *The Crow*: Poverty and Moral Complexity
An important dimension of the story: **Avva's family is not villainous, but helpless**.
*"It made no difference to them whether they listened to Bandodu's plea or not. They could do nothing."*
This is the **moral complexity of poverty**. The story shows Bandodu as a victim -but does not show Avva's family as **villains**. Both are **victims of the system** -just their **level of victimhood** differs.
This **moral complexity** presentation is Enoch's story-craft's supreme achievement. Dalit literature sometimes presents the simple binary of **oppressor-victim**. Enoch goes further and shows **multi-layered oppression**.
---
6. *Black Ink*: Narrative Structure and Craft
**First-Person Narration**
*Black Ink* is written in **first-person** -the "I" speaker is a Dalit-Christian woman. This narrative perspective is fundamentally different from *The Crow*. Here the **interiority of experience** -experiencing events as they are happening -is the story's center.
**Delayed Revelation**
The story's **structural surprise** is: the entire story proceeds as the narrative of an innocent, joyful child-visitor's sweet episode -and then suddenly, in the **final one-third**, the question of caste comes and **destroys all joy in a single moment**.
This **delayed revelation** technique is extremely powerful. If the story had been about caste conflict from the beginning -the reader would have been **mentally prepared**. When everything seems beautiful and innocent, the **sudden revelation of caste** wounds the reader with the **same pain** as the speaker.
**Two Levels of Language**
Two **linguistic levels** are simultaneously present in the story:
First -**poetic-figurative language** (used in describing the child): "a frock woven from butterfly wings," "a caravan of smiles," "a petal dipped in moonlight," "the shine of a rainbow."
Second -**naked realist language** (after the caste question): "Are you Harijan?", "I have no Harijan friend."
This **linguistic division** reflects the story's **thematic division**: before caste -beauty, innocence, human relationship. The revelation of caste -the language's beauty destroyed.
अपन मंतव्य editorial.staff.videha@zohomail.in पर पठाउ।